澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询

The Fed Could Cut Interest Rates Before The Election, Risking Political Fallout

U.S. President Donald Trump looks on as his nominee for the chairman of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell takes to the podium during a press event in the Rose Garden at the White House, November 2, 2017 in Washington, DC.
Then-Presid﷽ent Donald Trump looks on as his nominee🐷 for the chair of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, takes the podium at an event at the White House, on November 2, 2017. Powell remains chair of the Fed.

Drew Angerer / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

  • The Federal Reserve appears to be on track to cut its benchmark interest rate in September, just two months ahead of the general election in November.
  • According to conventional wisdom, a rate cut could boost the economy and encourage voters to reward the incumbent political party.
  • Fed officials value the central bank's independence and avoid stepping into political matters or favoring either party.
  • The risk of being accused of favoritism hasn't stopped the Fed from election-season rate cuts in the past when economic conditions warranted them.

Policymakers at the Federal Rese🅷rve try to avoid politics at all costs—but the central bank is widely expected to cut interest rates ahead of the November presidential election, a move that risks causing backlash.

The trajectory of the economy has set the Fed on a collision course with the general election, and possibly with former president Donald Trump, the Republican candidate in the 2💝024 race. Investors and economists expect the Fed to cut its benchmark interest rate b🐻y September.

But in an interview with Bloomberg Businessweek last week, Trump said a Fed rate cut ahead of the election was “something that they know they shouldn’t be doing." 

Why The Election Could Be Troubl🥀esome For The Fed

The dilemma for the Fed’s Open Market Committee (FOMC), which makes decisions on interest 🌃rates, is that it’s supposed to be independent. Fed officials say the central bank does its job ꧑more effectively because it stays out of the political fray.

Interest rate cuts during election season, however, could cဣall that independence into question. 

“If the Fed aggressively cuts its key interest rate, interest rates like mortgage rates, credit card rates and other borrowing rates will likely follow,” Mike Walden, an emeritus economics professor at North Carolina State University wrote in a blog post earlier this year. “More people will be able to buy homes, vehicles and other items, lifting consumer confidence and happiness. And, if people are more confident and happier, they may be more likely to reward incumbent politicians by voting for them.”

And helping one party—in this case, the Democrats—could provoke the opposition in this election season. Some members of the Trump campaign have reportedly 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:floated proposals to give the presid๊ent a say in the Fed’s decisꦐions on monetary policy.

“The FOMC has an undeniable (if never acknowledged) incentive to avoid initiating cuts in the last two months of a presidential election campaign,” Jan Hatzius, chief economist at Goldman Sachs, wrote in a commentary. 

Elections Haven’t Stopped Past Rate Cuts

Expectations have risen that the Fed will soon cut its benchmark rate from its current 23-year high because economic activity has slowed and inflation is on the path down toward the central bank's 2% annual target.

Fed officials recently have acknowledged the progress in taming inflation, while also saying that 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:a delay in cutting rates could cause unemployment to rise. The Fed has 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:a dual mandate to keep prices stable and maintain maximu🐷m employment.

Despite all the reasons to avoid election-season rate cuts, the Fed has made them in the past, Meera Pandit, global market strategist at J.P. Morgan Chase, noted in a recent commentary. 

The last time the Fed cut rates within two months of an election was in 2008 when the Fed chopped rates to near zero during 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:the Great Recession. Before that, the Fed cut rates in 1992 as the economy slowed. Neither of those rate cuts helped the incumbent party to stay in power, as in both years the White House changed hands from Republicans to Democrats. 

“Whether the Fed was adjusting based on dynamic economic conditions, responding to severe recessions, or following a path already forged, it continued to pursue its dual mandate irrespective of elections,” Pandit wrote.

Do you have a news tip for Investopedia reporters? Please email us at
Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Bloomberg Businessweek. "."

  2. North Carolina State University. ""

  3. Goldman Sachs. ""

  4. J.P. Morgan Asset Management. ""

  5. Federal Reserve. "."

Compare Accounts
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.

Related Articles